Re: Cthreads to Pthreads code.

2002-10-23 Thread James Morrison
--- Vicente Hernando Ara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all! > > I am changing the Hurd code from cthreads to pthreads. > > There will be some patches at http://es.gnu.org/~zenton/Pthread > (there are few now ;) > > Thanks, > Vicente. (aka: zenton in #hurd) Cool, but watch out for pthread_c

Re: Installing Hurd: dselect causes panic

2002-10-23 Thread Philip Charles
Try mounting the cdrom (use settrans) and then accessing the CD as a mounted file system. Phil. On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Greg Buchholz wrote: > > I'm installing the Hurd (J2 iso set) for the first > time and everything was going smoothly until I wanted > to start installing packages with "dselect".

Cthreads to Pthreads code.

2002-10-23 Thread Vicente Hernando Ara
Hi all! I am changing the Hurd code from cthreads to pthreads. There will be some patches at http://es.gnu.org/~zenton/Pthread (there are few now ;) I wanna ask for help on the following issues: * In pfinet code appear __mutex_lock and __mutex_unlock functions, instead mutex_lock and so. Th

Installing Hurd: dselect causes panic

2002-10-23 Thread Greg Buchholz
I'm installing the Hurd (J2 iso set) for the first time and everything was going smoothly until I wanted to start installing packages with "dselect". When I select "cdrom" as the install media, I get a message like... /dev/fd5: line222: 59 Segmentation fault mount >$tp.m ...and dselect recover

Autoconf 2.54 patch for the Hurd

2002-10-23 Thread Jeff Bailey
I've back to hacking on the Hurd build stuff. Automake 1.7.1 requires Autoconf 2.54. Also, this allows the same autoconf to work on both glibc and hurd. This is my bare-minimum patch for upgrading. I will follow with more patches to remove obsolete macros after this one is applied. 2002-10-23

Attention Petri Koistinen

2002-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Your mailer bounces valid mail for no reason; you need to fix it if you are going to continue to post on bug-hurd. A sample message was returned thus with the message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host joo.ath.cx [80.222.59.131]: 55

Re: uname -s

2002-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Petri Koistinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think uname -s should print: GNUmach. uname -s prints the kernel, but it's the "kernel" in Unixspeak, that is, the thing that interprets the "system calls" where the "system calls" are read/write/open. In other words, the canonical case is a monoli

Re: uname -s

2002-10-23 Thread Petri Koistinen
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Robert Millan wrote: > > I think uname -s should print: GNUmach. > > That would break scripts that rely on uname -s. > > On the other hand, I think uname is wrong in changing the -s, > which has always corresponded to "system", into kernel > just because Linux, the kernel, c

Re: uname -s

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:47:23AM +0300, Petri Koistinen wrote: > Hi! > > I think uname -s should print: GNUmach. That would break scripts that rely on uname -s. On the other hand, I think uname is wrong in changing the -s, which has always corresponded to "system", into kernel just because Lin

Re: [PATCH] ftpfs

2002-10-23 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just curious; was there something wrong with that patch? Nothing that pops out at first, but perhaps nobody has had a chance to look at it in detail. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.