Title: ÅåÅå Æ¢´Â °³¼ºÀÖ´Â µµ¸ÞÀÎ Æ÷¿öµù ¾ÆÀÌ·¯ºê½ºÅ¸ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
2002³â»õ·Î¿î À̸ÞÀϱ¤°í »ç¾÷¿¡ µ¿ÂüÇÏ½Ç Àü±¹Áö»ç ¸ðÁý
¾È³çÇϽʴϱî? ÀúÈñnettopia21 ´Â ¸¹Àº °æÇè°ú ³ëÇϿ츦 ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î
½Å°³³äÀÇ ±¤°í e-mail ¸¶ÄÉÆà ±¤°í´ëÇà ¼îÇθô¿î¿µ¿¡ µ¿ÂüÇÒ
´É·ÂÀÖ´Â Àü±¹Áö»ç¸¦ ¸ðÁýÇÕ´Ï´Ù...
ÀúÈñ´Â ±×µ¿¾È ¸¹Àº ±¤°í ´ëÇà°ú ´õºÒ¾î ¿Â¶óÀÎ »ó¿¡¼ Á¦Ç°ÆǸŠ¹×
È«º¸ ´ëÇà »ç¾÷À»
Title: ¼¼»ó¿¡¼ °¡Àå ´ÞÄÞÇÑ ¿µÈ°ü
¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ󸮰¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áý´Ï´Ù.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
ÇѸÞÀÏÀÇ ¿ìÇ¥Á¦ ½Ç½Ã·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Èûµå½Ç°Å¶ó »ý°¢ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Á¦°¡ ¾à°£ÀÇ µµ¿òÀ» µå¸±±îÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾ÆÁÖ ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀÎ Á¦¾ÈÀ¸·Î¿ä.
¹ß¼ÛÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 2°³ ¸ÞÀÏÃßÃâÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 3°³ °Ô½ÃÆǵî·ÏÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 1°³¿Í
¸ÞÀÏ ¸®½ºÆ® 1000¸¸°³¸¦ 9¸¸¿ø¿¡ µå¸±±î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÞÀϸ®½ºÆ®´Â ÇѸÞÀϵµ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ºÐ·ù´Â Á÷Á¢ÇÏ½Ã¸é µÉ°Ì´Ï´Ù. °ü
ÇѸÞÀÏÀÇ ¿ìÇ¥Á¦ ½Ç½Ã·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Èûµå½Ç°Å¶ó »ý°¢ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Á¦°¡ ¾à°£ÀÇ µµ¿òÀ» µå¸±±îÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾ÆÁÖ ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀÎ Á¦¾ÈÀ¸·Î¿ä.
¹ß¼ÛÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 2°³ ¸ÞÀÏÃßÃâÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 3°³ °Ô½ÃÆǵî·ÏÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 1°³¿Í
¸ÞÀÏ ¸®½ºÆ® 1000¸¸°³¸¦ 9¸¸¿ø¿¡ µå¸±±î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÞÀϸ®½ºÆ®´Â ÇѸÞÀϵµ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ºÐ·ù´Â Á÷Á¢ÇÏ½Ã¸é µÉ°Ì´Ï´Ù. °ü
Title: ³×¿À¿¡¹ö - ¾î¸¥µéÀÇ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼¼»ó
¡Ø If you recieve this e-mail, please click the rejection button. [rejection]
¡Ø Because of operation error, this e-mail may be delivered.
¡Ø Please click the rejection button, and a measure suited to the rejection will be done.
¡Ø º» ¸ÞÀÏ
-º»
¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ
[±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç,
ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
-
-º»
¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ
[±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç,
ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
-
Öйú²©ÀÀ»á
www.china-exposition.net
www.24-china.com
Öйú²©ÀÀ»áÊÇÓÉÊÀ½ç¾¼ÃÑо¿ÖÐÐĺÍÊÀ½çÎÄ»¯ÒÕÊõÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ£¨Ïã¸Û£©¼àÖÆ£¬Í¬Ê±ÃæÏòÈ«¹ú¸÷µØÒÔ¼°ÊÀ½ç180¸ö¹ú¼Ò3ÒÚ¹ÛÖڵĴóÐÍרҵÕý¹æÍøÕ¾¡£
ÍøÂ粩ÀÀ»áÀûÓû¥ÁªÍøÐÅÏ¢¸üС¢¸ü¿ì£¬ÄÚÈÝͼÎIJ¢Ã¯¡¢²»Êܳ¡µØºÍʱ¼äÏÞÖÆ£¨ÊÀ½ç¸÷µØ24Сʱ¾ù¿ÉÉÏÍøä¯ÀÀ£©¡¢´
Öйú²©ÀÀ»á
www.china-exposition.net
www.24-china.com
Öйú²©ÀÀ»áÊÇÓÉÊÀ½ç¾¼ÃÑо¿ÖÐÐĺÍÊÀ½çÎÄ»¯ÒÕÊõÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ£¨Ïã¸Û£©¼àÖÆ£¬Í¬Ê±ÃæÏòÈ«¹ú¸÷µØÒÔ¼°ÊÀ½ç180¸ö¹ú¼Ò3ÒÚ¹ÛÖڵĴóÐÍרҵÕý¹æÍøÕ¾¡£
ÍøÂ粩ÀÀ»áÀûÓû¥ÁªÍøÐÅÏ¢¸üС¢¸ü¿ì£¬ÄÚÈÝͼÎIJ¢Ã¯¡¢²»Êܳ¡µØºÍʱ¼äÏÞÖÆ£¨ÊÀ½ç¸÷µØ24Сʱ¾ù¿ÉÉÏÍøä¯ÀÀ£©¡¢´
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:35:35PM +0200, Ludo' wrote:
> Most of the time I work under the Hurd, I prefer to start an X server.
> However, I noticed that the system gets rather unstable when using X: it
> freezes of sometimes even reboot and my maximum uptime with X running is about
> 5 hours. Is
Èç²»ÏëÔÙÊÕµ½´ËÀàÓʼþ£¬Çë»ØПøÎÒÃÇ£º[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ÈçÐèÒª¶©·¿£¬Çë·¢ÐÅÖÁ£º[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
-
ÄúºÃ£¡ÒÔϾƵêÓÉÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÌرðÍƼö,Ç뿼ÂÇ:
..
..
´ó»ª¾Æµê ËÄÐǼ¶ 2000Ä꿪ҵ
.. 680ÔªËÍË«·ÝÖÐÎ÷×ÔÖúÔç²Í
.. ¸¶¿î·½Ê½:Òò½»Ò׻᷿¼ä½ôÕÅ,ÇëÔ¤¸
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä º¸¾È°æºñȸ»ç
ĸ½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¹«Àκ¸¾È½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¹«·á·Î ¼³Ä¡ÇØ µå¸®°í ÀÖ»ç¿À´Ï ºÎµð À̹ø±âȸ¿¡ Àú·ÅÇÏ°Ô
¼³Ä¡ÇÏ½Ê½Ã¿ä ¾ÆÆÄÆ® »ó°¡ ´ë¸®Á¡ »ç¹«½Ç ÁÖÁ¡ À½½ÄÁ¡ °øÀåµî 365ÀÏ ¾ÈÀüÀ»
Ã¥ÀÓÁ®µå¸³´Ï´Ù ÀüÈÁֽøé ÀÚ¼¼È÷ ¾È³» ÇØ µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù ½ÃÈï½Ã Àü¹®¿µ¾÷µô·¯
ÀÌ°úÀå018-232-2677Àü±¹ ¾îµðµç ¿¬¶
This is not a Hurd-specific problem.
Please take it up on the gcc or libc lists.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
> (Well, it kept me busy for about
> 5 days: the machine is low on cpu, low on memory and low on diskspace.
> And it occasionally crashes. O well.)
You will certainly see large speedups in I/O if you use 4kb pages.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PR
> I noticed a strange behaviour of gdb when debugging code that had been
> compiled with `-O2 -mpentium': when stepping, gdb sometimes seems to get lost
> in the code (goes back to the same line several times for instance).
This is normal with optimized code.
Hi,
Most of the time I work under the Hurd, I prefer to start an X server.
However, I noticed that the system gets rather unstable when using X: it
freezes of sometimes even reboot and my maximum uptime with X running is about
5 hours. Is it a `known problem' or something that happens only with m
Hi Neal,
[Sorry for crossposting, Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .]
Sorry for this ridiculously late reply; I've been quite busy (see below
on doing what... ;-)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 10:12:38PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > > Running dselect or apt-get very often gets my hurd box on
Title: ÀÌ°÷Àº Á¦¸ñÀÔ´Ï´Ù
ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϽôµ¥ ²À ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À»
¾öû Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ÆË´Ï´Ù
ÃÖ½ÅÇ®¹öÀü°ÔÀÓ. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. ¼ºÀνõð µîµî
ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ ¸ðµç½Ãµð°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
ÃֽŸñ·ÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¹°·Ð ½Å¿ëÀº ±âº»ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¾ÐÃàÈÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ Àüȳª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä
ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ»
Title: [±¤°í]Å©·¹ÀÌÁö À×±Û¸®½¬
Áß±¹ °¿¬½ÇȲ [MBC ÈÁ¦ÁýÁß]
½Åû ¾ç½Ä
À̸§
¼ºº°
³²
¿©
Á÷¾÷
¼±Åà ÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä!
==
Á÷ÀåÀÎ
ÀÚ¿µ¾÷
´ëÇлý
°íµîÇлý
ÁßÇлý
ÃʵîÇлý
ÁÖºÎ
±âŸ
³ªÀÌ
¼¼
ÀüȹøÈ£
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:26:20AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:36:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with
> > stdio too. The iconv and gconv modules aren't that essential, we can
> > fix it later IMHO. I don't
Hi,
I noticed a strange behaviour of gdb when debugging code that had been
compiled with `-O2 -mpentium': when stepping, gdb sometimes seems to get lost
in the code (goes back to the same line several times for instance). I'm not
sure this is really a bug since this is probably not recommended to
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:31:55AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > > The testsuite won't even run, which suggests larger problems. I'm
> > > not worried about individual tests failing.
>
> > > I suspect there's not alot to get ri
$
THIS IS A GOLDEN CHANCE
YOU HAVE ONCE IN A LIFETIME
I am giving it to you because the more money you will make,
the more money I will make too.
$$
DO NOT DELETE !
just print the document, read it very carefully, give i
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The testsuite won't even run, which suggests larger problems. I'm
> > not worried about individual tests failing.
> > I suspect there's not alot to get right, and no reason we can't do
> > it this week.
> Strange, it worked fo
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:36:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is
> > failing. I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
> I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with
> stdio too. The iconv and gconv modules a
Title: Mail
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is failing.
> I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with stdio
too. The iconv and gconv modules aren't that es
Title: ´ÙÇÔ²² ¸¸µå´Â ³»°íÇâ ÀåÅÍ
¼ö»ê¹° ¤Ó Ư»ê¹°
¤Ó ³ó»ê¹° ¤Ó
°Ç°½ÄÇ°/½ÄÇ° ¤Ó °ø»êÇ°
Hi,
As I had previously mentioned gcc3 warns that,
attrs_exist = ntohl (*p++);
and
attrs_exist = ntohl (*(p++));
' operation on `p' may be undefined'.
However, in nfs/rpc.c we have:
switch (ntohl (*p++))
.
The only way I have though of fixing this so far is with
p++;
swit
Title: Investors
This message has been
sent to you as a subscriber of the "Financial Update" in compliance with
our strict anti-abuse regulations. We will continue to bring you valuable
offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you do not
wis
Title: °Ãß!! ¼ºÀε¿¿µ»ó
±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼ÇÎ Áß¿¡¼ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E_Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
´õ ÀÌ»ó ÀÌ¿Í À¯»çÇÑ Á¤º¸¿¡ °üÇÑ À̸ÞÀÏÀÇ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇϽøé
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¸¦ ´·¯ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
ÀÌ Á¤º¸³»¿ëÀº û¼Ò³âÀ¯ÇظÅü¹°·Î¼ Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸ÁÀÌ¿ë ÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü ¹
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:01:26AM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Do you have any preferance as to when that occurs?
>
> Not really (you're the people doing the builds that are affected). But I
> would like to see some more testing. I thought there were still some
> spurious errors that were
Title: Mail
> Do you have any preferance as to when that occurs?
Not really (you're the people doing the builds that are affected). But I
would like to see some more testing. I thought there were still some
spurious errors that were unexplained, though maybe I am just unclear on
which fixes affected which
35 matches
Mail list logo
