Title: Investors
Wall Street
StockwatchWasatch
Pharmaceuticals: Company Update
Special Corporate
Update WSCH
Company
Name
Wasatch
Pharmaceuticals
À§ ±×¸²À» Ŭ¸¯ÇϽøé ÇÁ·£Â÷ÀÌÁî»ç¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ º¸½Ç
¼ö°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ²ÞÀÇ ºñÁî´Ï½º Ŭ·´ => http://1promise.starhana.com °ú ¼º°øÆÄÆ®³Ê°¡ µÇ¾î
º¸½Ê½Ã¿À.
Áö±Ý±îÁöÀÇ °³³ä¿¡¼ ¶³¾îÁ® ÀÌ
´ëÇõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ¿©Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ¶Ù¾îµé¾î ¼º°øÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷ÀÌ µÇ¾îº¸½Ê½Ã¿À.ÀúÈñµéÀº ±×°ÍÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ¸¸ÀüÀÇ Áغñ¸
Title: GPS °ü·Ã Àü¹® ¼îÇθô | GPSShop.co.kr
PDA¸¦
ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ GPS ³×ºñ°ÔÀÌ¼Ç ÆÑÅ°Áö...
GPS Ä«¸Þ¶ó °æº¸±â... GPS Á¾ÇÕ ¼îÇθô !!!
Title: ÆмǺ§Æ® 1¹øÁö º§Æ®ÇöóÀÚ
¿©¼ºÀÇ ÆмÇÀ» ¿Ï¼ºÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¹Ù·Î º§Æ®¿Í ¾×¼¼¼¸®!
ºñ½Ñ Á¤ÀåÀ¸·Î Â÷·ÁÀÔÀ¸¼Ì´Âµ¥ º§Æ®´Â ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¼Ì´Ù±¸¿ä?
È°µ¿ÀûÀÎ ÈüÇÕ ÆмÇÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇϼ̴µ¥ ±×¿¡ ¸Â´Â º§Æ®°¡ ¾øÀ¸½Ã´Ù±¸¿ä?
±¦ÂúÀº º§Æ®¿Í ¾×¼¼¼¸®¸¦ ±¸ÀÔÇÏ°í ½ÍÀºµ¥, »ý°¢¸¸Å
À§ ±×¸²À» Ŭ¸¯ÇϽøé ÇÁ·£Â÷ÀÌÁî»ç¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ º¸½Ç
¼ö°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ²ÞÀÇ ºñÁî´Ï½º Ŭ·´ => http://1promise.starhana.com °ú ¼º°øÆÄÆ®³Ê°¡ µÇ¾î
º¸½Ê½Ã¿À.
Áö±Ý±îÁöÀÇ °³³ä¿¡¼ ¶³¾îÁ® ÀÌ
´ëÇõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ¿©Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ¶Ù¾îµé¾î ¼º°øÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷ÀÌ µÇ¾îº¸½Ê½Ã¿À.ÀúÈñµéÀº ±×°ÍÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ¸¸ÀüÀÇ Áغñ¸
Title: GPS °ü·Ã Àü¹® ¼îÇθô | GPSShop.co.kr
PDA¸¦
ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÚµ¿Â÷ GPS ³×ºñ°ÔÀÌ¼Ç ÆÑÅ°Áö...
GPS Ä«¸Þ¶ó °æº¸±â... GPS Á¾ÇÕ ¼îÇθô !!!
Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we should certainly use vm_copy for whole-page copies in
> > pager_memcpy because of the badly suboptimal behavior you've described.
>
> I have cooked up the attached implementation. I checked everything
> but a few border cases -- I need
Title: ±ÍÇÏÀÇÇã¶ô¾øÀ̱¤°í¸ÞÀϵ帰Á¡Á¤ÁßÈ÷»ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù.
±ÍÇÏÀÇ Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ µå¸°Á¡ Á¤ÁßÈ÷
»ç°ú µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
ÀúÈñ´Â Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹ýÀ»
ÁؼöÇÏ¿© ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÓÀ» Ç¥½Ã ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼ö½Å
°ÅºÎÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÇÊÈ÷ ¸¶·Ã ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ÞÀÏ Á¤º¸¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í
ÀÖÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¹Ç
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:12:12AM -0700, Jon Arney wrote:
> Here's a start at some performance statistics. I suggest that
> if anyone else is interested in characterizing the system that
> they begin with downloading bonnie:
>
> http://www.textuality.com/bonnie/download.html
>
> Run it under t
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> I remember seeing this message also. Might be the reason why X is generally
> quite slow. Thanks for the trick! ;) But why would nice be broken?
http://bugs.debian.org/44039
Thanks,
Marcus
_
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:26:46PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> I recall seeing "nice() failed" messages the last time I tried X under
> the Hurd, I think that's the reason for this. Try setting the X
> priority to the same value as all other processes imder GNU/Linux and
> start doing unpacking
Title: >>>ÀÎÅ׸®¾î Çпø,ij¸¯Å͵ðÀÚÀÎÇпø,À¥µðÀÚÀÎÇпø,À¥¸¶½ºÅÍÇпø,ÀÌÆ÷Çпø,ÀÎÅͳÝÄ·ÆÛ½ºÇпø <<<
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í]
¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼 ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
Title: Secured Investements
Earn 15%-300% Interest On Your Money
GUARANTEED BY THE GOVERNMENT!
Government Secured Tax Cerificates Provide:
The highest guaranteed interest returns compared to any other investment.
A return up to 100 times your mo
Hi,
At the risk of being too abrasive, I'd like to weigh in on the
issues of performance characterization I saw during the course
of this thread and hope to clear up a potential misunderstanding.
I begin by examining an argument presented on CPU utilization and
move on to provide what I believe i
Title: »õ ÆäÀÌÁö 1
WWW.BAROSTOCK.COM
ÃÖ°ÀÇ ÃÊ¹Ì´Ï Áõ±Ç½Ç½Ã°£ ºê¶ó¿ìÀú
ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ³»·Á¹Þ±âÇÏ¿© ¼³Ä¡ÇϽðí Login ȸ鿡¼
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ(¹«·á)À» ÇϽøé ÀÏÁÖÀÏ°£ ¹«·á·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¡¡
* º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å(±¤°í)ÀÓÀ» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù.
Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï
Title: ³ª¿ì´©¸® ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ
Title: Investors
Wall Street
StockwatchWasatch
Pharmaceuticals: Company Update
Special Corporate
Update WSCH
Company
Name
Wasatch
Pharmaceuticals
> > Well, that's a very subjective observation but on the same machine under
> > Linux, doing the same kind of operation (unpacking stuff), X looks much
> > more 'reactive' than what I actually noticed under the Hurd.
>
> I recall seeing "nice() failed" messages the last time I tried X under
> th
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:11:25PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> > But anyway, for a performance comparison between Hurd and Linux to be
> > meaningful, one would have to do it on the same or at least pretty
> > similar hardware. I just wanted to point out that I wouldn't expect
> > all kinds of
> It's been awhile since I tried using mtools, but I remember getting a seg
> fault. Anyway, are you using screen? I'm just curious because I don't
> remember mtools causing my system to freeze; At worst I had I switched screens
> and killed the process.
I wasn't using screen. But what hapenn
> But anyway, for a performance comparison between Hurd and Linux to be
> meaningful, one would have to do it on the same or at least pretty
> similar hardware. I just wanted to point out that I wouldn't expect
> all kinds of heavy disk mangling to necessarily imply heavy cpu
> activity.
Well, th
Title: e-4
Title: : Á¶ÈÀ¯ÀÇ ¹Ì±¹¿µ¾î :
* º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å (±¤°í)ÀÓÀ» ¹àÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á ÁË¼Û ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ E-MAILÀº °Ô½ÃÆÇ µî
ÀÎÅͳ
¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä... ´Ù¸§ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Á¦°¡ À̹ø¿¡ °¡Áö°í
ÀÖ´Â ¸ðµç µ·À» °¡Áö°í ¼îÇθôÀ» ¿ÀÇ ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù. ¾î·Á¿î »óȲ¿¡ ¿ÀÇÂÇÑ ÅͶó ³Ê¹«³ª Èûµç »óȲ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ »çÀÌÆ®¿¡ ¿À¼Å¼
µû¶æÇÑ ÇѸ¶µð ºÎŹ µå¸³´Ï´Ù. www.najababara.co.kr , www.najababara.com °°Àº °÷ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±×¸®°í
¹«¸®ÇÑ ºÎŹÀÌÁö¸¸ ¸¹Àº ºÐ
24 matches
Mail list logo
