¡°³Ç¼Êͨ¡±±ãЯʽÎÀÐǵ¼º½Æû³µµçÄÔ

Title: ³Ç¼ÊÔÚÏß ¡¡   ¡¡ ¡¡

±±¾©ÀñÆ·´óÈ«---¸øÓèÏà¹ØÖ÷¹ÜÈËÔ±´óÔ¼5%µÄÓ¶½ð¡£

±±¾©Î´ï˳ÊÇÒ»¼ÒרҵÀñÆ·Éè¼Æ¡¢Éú²ú¡¢ÖÆ×÷ÓëÏúÊÛΪһÌåÂÃÓÎÓÃÆ·ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾. Ö÷Óª²úÆ·£ºÀñÆ·¡¢°ì¹«ÓÃÆ·¡¢¼ÒÍ¥ÓÃÆ·¡¢´ÙÏúÆ·¡¢¹ã¸æÉ¡¡¢ÀñÆ·±í¡¢¹ã¸æ±Ê¡¢¹ã¸æÆË¿Ë¡¢ÆóÒµÓ¡Ë¢¡¢²»¸É½ºÉ̱êÓ¡Ë¢¡£ ¡¡ http://www.bjlpdq.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] µç»°£º£¨010£©87794771 87794770 67788002 ´«Õ棺£¨010£©87794770 ÊÖ»ú £º139012

[±¤°í] "»õ³ª¶ó ¸¸µéÀÚ" ±¸ÀԾȳ»¹®

Title: [±¤°í] "»õ³ª¶ó ¸¸µéÀÚ" ±¸ÀԾȳ»¹® [±¤°í] "»õ³ª¶ó ¸¸µéÀÚ" ±¸ÀԾȳ»¹® ¤· Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù!! ¤·º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¤·´õ ÀÌ»ó ¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é¿©±â[=ȸ½Å¸ÞÀÏ]¿¡¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ¶Ç´Â ¼ö½ÅÈ®ÀÎÀ̶ó´

Duplicate version?

I'm just on my way to bed, and noticed that my hurd cross compile (which is supposedly using the glibc that I just built) failed with the following error. I have made no effort to trouble shoot it, I'm just posting it so that people know where I'm at. I'll look into it tommorow. i386-pc-gnu-gcc

Re: some console code checked in

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:06:33PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > Our chief concern to begin with is clean code reuse and consistency of the > terminal emulation for standard display devices. Turning the interface > inside out doesn't lose that. Yeah, sure. I think it is important I get the key

System V Shared Memory

Neal did something on this before. Look through the bug-hurd and hurd-devel archives for "System V Shared Memory" (or just google for that plus hurd). I think the conclusion of that was he had a proposal that used existing filesystem calls to implement almost everything. I don't recall the deta

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:48:35PM -0700, Jon Arney wrote: > Correct me if my interpretation of those links is incorrect. My > understanding of what you're shooting for is a translator free > implementation. i.e. You would like to see an implementation which > merely maps the shm* calls into exi

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

Marcus, Correct me if my interpretation of those links is incorrect. My understanding of what you're shooting for is a translator free implementation. i.e. You would like to see an implementation which merely maps the shm* calls into existing filesystem calls. For instance, rather than having a

µû¶æÇÑ º½³¯ ¾ÆÁ÷µµ ¾ÖÀÎÀÌ ¾øÀ¸½Å°¡¿ä [±¤°í]

Title: ³×¿À¿¡¹ö - ¾î¸¥µéÀÇ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼¼»ó ¡Ø º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¡Ø e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù ¡Ø DB¿À·ù·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¾à°£ÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ º¹¼ö¹ß¼Û µÉ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ·¡ ´ã´ç

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 11:05:21PM -0700, Jon Arney wrote: > James, > > Thanks for the links. One of the difficult things about coming up to > speed on the Hurd is that there are so many different websites with > lots of (sometimes conflicting) information. This mailing list is the place to cl

(no subject)

   Å׸¶ ´©µå¿©Çà ..)a     °Ü¿ì³» ¿òÃß·È´ø ¸ö°ú¸¶À½À» ÈÇÈÇ ¹þ¾î¹ö¸®°í~~!     ¿©ÇàÀ» ¶°³ªÀÚ~!     ÀúÈñ 060 - 700 - 4249 ¸¸ÀÇ Æ¯º°ÇÑ À̺¥Æ®~     ¼Ö·ÎµéÀ» À§ÇÑ   µ¿¹Ý¿©ÇàÀ̺¥Æ®~     µü ¸Â´Â À̼ºÀ» ¸¸³ªº¸¼¼¿ä~~!        060 - 700 - 4249    060 - 700  - 4249 060 - 700 - 4249     Ä¥°ø°ø    »çÀÌ»ç±

Re: posix shared memory

--- Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > > Thanks for the links. One of the difficult things about coming up to > speed on the Hurd is that there are so many different websites with > lots of (sometimes conflicting) information. Yes, luckily this has gotten a bit better with most s

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

Hi! James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personal Plug: I have collected on my website all the translators I know of. > I'll the new procfs and httpfs this weekend. see hurd.dyndns.org I also did a list a while ago, see . Cheers, GNU/Wolfgang -- W

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another good idea. Forgive my simple-minded-ness, but a simple > approach to the problem might be for filesystems to voluntarily > register themselves by simply writing to /etc/mtab as a real > file. Is this a job that really needs a translator to do? > W

Re: Linux style /proc filesystem translator

Jon Arney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One question I had was about your list of planned changes. On there, > you list "Posix shared memory". Is anybody working on this? Somebody did some work on it a while ago. I don't remember the details, but there were some discussion on the lists (it sho

[±¤°í] ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀÎ À¥È£½ºÆà 1³â¿¡ 4¸¸¿ø 200M

Title: SCV ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. º» À̸ÞÀÏÀº Á¦Ç°±¤°í¸¦ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î º¸³½¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.ºÒÆíÇÏ¼Ì´Ù¸é ±íÀÌ »ç°úµå¸®¸ç º»¸ÞÀÏ ÀÌÈÄ·Î ´Ù½Ã ¹ß¼ÛµÇÁö ¾ÊÀ» °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. º»¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¹ß¼ÛÇÑ°÷Àº SCV ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. [¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ]