Title: HelloTel
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:24:36PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Question - Do you have a plan for what makes it a "0.3" ABI vs. a
> > "1.0" ABI? If this should be a fairly stable and long term change, it
> > might be nice to have at least something of ours at a 1.0 stage.
>
> :-) Well, it's
--- Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I compiled the stock firmlink source with this line:
> >
> > gcc -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -o firmlink firmlink.orig.c -ltrivfs
> > -lfshelp
>
> You need to link with the cthread library.
>
Thanks, linking to libthreads fixed it.
=
James
> I compiled the stock firmlink source with this line:
>
> gcc -ggdb -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -o firmlink firmlink.orig.c -ltrivfs
> -lfshelp
You need to link with the cthread library.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/
I've managed to get the same problem as Justin Langer.
Here is a backtrace, it's the same as Justin's:
(gdb) info thread
2 thread 17065.2 0x0105528c in evc_wait () from /lib/libc.so.0.2
* 1 thread 17065.1 0x011dec1c in cthread_fork_child ()
from /lib/libthreads.so.0.2
(gdb) bt
#0 0x011
> I got all steps correctly except making gdb notice after the file_exec
> happened. By the way, do I need to reset the breakpoints when attaching to
> a new task (in a series of debuggings)?
You should need to, no. If gdb properly understands what's going on, it
will remove and reinsert breakp
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:22:32AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I feel a bit stupid now. I guess I should try a compilation from a
> tree without such hacks...
Bingo.
--
I gotta ding ding dang a dang a long ding dong.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Title: ÀüÇô »õ·Î¿î °³³äÀÇ Æ÷Å»»çÀÌÆ®
ÀüÇô »õ·Î¿î °³³äÀÇ Æ÷Å»»çÀÌÆ®!!
Æ÷Å»·Î(http://portalro.wo.to)
ÃֽŰî,¿µÈ,¿Í·¹Áî,¾Ö´Ï¸ÞÀ̼Ç,¿¬¿¹Á¤º¸...
¸ðµç Á¤º¸¸¦ ÇÑ°÷¿¡¼ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
mp3´Ù¿î·Îµå,¾Ö´ÏÀ½¹Ý°¨»ó,À©¾ÚÇÁ½ºÅ²,À©µµ¹ÙÅÁȸé...
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:56:47AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > The only thing really funny about it is that there are no fds.
> > You could try seeing if that breaks things in a chroot'd environment
> > (exec 0<&- 1>&- 2>&-; exec /libexec/console-run blah).
>
> That is a hit!
Uhh. Y
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:27:29PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I tried to boot with -df (one of those, I don't remember which, makes sure
> > init pauses before calling file_exec), and attach gdb to the task, and set
> > break points.
>
> You have to make sure you're doing things in the pr
Title: HelloTel
11 matches
Mail list logo
