Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Farid Hajji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Network-wide unique identifiers like task-IDs, ports, etc... are a nice > > > thing to have. One idea may be to organize all nodes of a collective > > > in a distributed kind of (hurdisch) filesystem. IDs would then be > > > simple paths and could be

Re: /hurd/tmpfs problem

2002-01-06 Thread Ondrej Hurt
> Hi, > > when using the tmpfs translator of the Debian hurd package of > 2001 Nov 5, I experience problems. I had been experiencing severe problems too. Then I tried to compile tmpfs from fresh Hurd source and it seemed to be work nice. ___

Re: /hurd/tmpfs problem

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Teichgraeber
Using tmpfs as an active translator, its behaviour is different on my machine: A tmpfs process is running, but the underlying node does not get translated into a directory. According to `manual bootstrapping a translator' of Neal Walfield I started a gdb session on tmpfs. For instance, i tried to

Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?

2002-01-06 Thread Farid Hajji
> > Network-wide unique identifiers like task-IDs, ports, etc... are a nice > > thing to have. One idea may be to organize all nodes of a collective > > in a distributed kind of (hurdisch) filesystem. IDs would then be > > simple paths and could be located with some kind of distributed > > lookup(