Re: a recursive lock prototype

2001-07-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Maybe I missed something, but what specifically is this for? Anyway, on to more substantive comments: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > struct recursive_lock > { > spin_lock_t protection; > int locked; > struct mutex mutex; > }; What is the separate "protection" bit for? > void > recursive

a recursive lock prototype

2001-07-04 Thread moshez
#include #include #define RECURSIVE_LOCK_INITIALIZER = {0, 0, MUTEX_INITIALIZER}; struct recursive_lock { spin_lock_t protection; int locked; struct mutex mutex; }; void recursive_lock (struct recursive_lock *lock); void recursive_unlock (struct recursive_lock *lock); void recursive_lo

Re: [DOC-FIX] libdiskfs: initialization functions

2001-07-04 Thread Roland McGrath
> 2001-05-07 Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * diskfs.h: Fix comments about initialization. > > * diskfs.h: Move diskfs_start_bootstrap prototype from here . . . > * priv.h: . . . to here. I am dropping this patch. diskfs_start_bootstrap is not a private function (e