Re: glibc: some change between 2001-02-27 and 2001-04-01

2001-06-17 Thread Roland McGrath
Please quote the whole top change log entry when referring to libc states. The dates in the log entries are not strictly ordered, so sometimes saying a date is unclear to me. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/list

glibc: some change between 2001-02-27 and 2001-04-01

2001-06-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, 2001-04-01 (all up to 2001-03-30 ChangeLog entry by Roland): doesn't work for me. 2001-03-28: doesn't compile (csu/abit-none problem, libc_multiple_libcs in init-first.c and rtld.c). 2001-03-10: doesn't compile (libc_multiple_libcs in init-first.c and rtld.c) 2001-02-27: works fine for

Long Distance Flat Rate Plan 5722

2001-06-17 Thread cc4less
Title: Flat Rate Long Distance Unlimited Long Distance, One Low Flat RateTest the quality, andTry it for FREE!! We'll activate your Flat Rate Unlimited Long Distance Service for 1 week FREE* to prove that the quality and service is what you expect.

Re: LD_DEBUG not giving anything

2001-06-17 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 09:20:09PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > It used to be that if you attach gdb before there are any threads, > > you had to do some diddling after the threads got created to make > > it notice them. e.g. "info thr" after you've hit return, to make > > sure gdb knows ab

Re: LD_DEBUG not giving anything

2001-06-17 Thread Neal H Walfield
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:36:42PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:52:56AM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > > I tried > > > > > > LD_DEBUG=foo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/new-glibc /new-glibc/ld-2.2.3.so /bin/rpctrace > > > > > > with foo being one of those which you get when

Re: LD_DEBUG not giving anything

2001-06-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:52:56AM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > I tried > > > > LD_DEBUG=foo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/new-glibc /new-glibc/ld-2.2.3.so /bin/rpctrace > > > > with foo being one of those which you get when setting foo as "help" > > (like files, libs, statistics etc). > > > > Not a s

Re: might not be glibc after all

2001-06-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > it might not be a glibc problem after all. I have gone back as far as > 2001-02-26, and that was broken already. I am now trying to compile the > version corresponding to the current working Debian package 2001-02-16. > If that

Re: LD_DEBUG not giving anything

2001-06-17 Thread Neal H Walfield
> I tried > > LD_DEBUG=foo LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/new-glibc /new-glibc/ld-2.2.3.so /bin/rpctrace > > with foo being one of those which you get when setting foo as "help" > (like files, libs, statistics etc). > > Not a single foo prints anything. I always get: > > /bin/rpctrace: error while loading

might not be glibc after all

2001-06-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, it might not be a glibc problem after all. I have gone back as far as 2001-02-26, and that was broken already. I am now trying to compile the version corresponding to the current working Debian package 2001-02-16. If that is broken as well, we have a tool chain problem. I use binutils vers

Re: LD_DEBUG not giving anything

2001-06-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 09:20:09PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > It used to be that if you attach gdb before there are any threads, > you had to do some diddling after the threads got created to make > it notice them. e.g. "info thr" after you've hit return, to make > sure gdb knows about all th