Re: glibc broken

2001-05-23 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:04:54PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > It is important to be clear about what works and what doesn't: > > > > * statically linked user programs > > * statically linked user programs that use cthreads > > I don't see how a statically linked program can be affected b

Re: glibc broken

2001-05-23 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:31:57PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > dynamically linked programs fail with: > /hurd/hello: error while loading shared libraries: /hurd/hello: cannot open shared >object file: No such file or directory > > statically linked programs fail with: > Killed I forgot

Re: glibc broken

2001-05-23 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:04:54PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > Also test whether running a program via ld.so works, > i.e. /lib/ld.so.1 /bin/foo arg1 arg2 > > This is how exec gets run. Try /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec --help. And Roland won the price again! All Hurd servers and user space progr

Re: glibc broken

2001-05-23 Thread Mark Kettenis
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:38:18 +0200 On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:04:54PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > It is important to be clear about what works and what doesn't: > > * statically linked user programs > * statically linked user

Re: glibc broken

2001-05-23 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:04:54PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > It is important to be clear about what works and what doesn't: > > * statically linked user programs > * statically linked user programs that use cthreads I don't see how a statically linked program can be affected by a glibc upgr