From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: page fault in mach_msg_trap
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:57:41 +0200
> We don't have BogoMIPS calulcation in GNU Mach.
IIRC, I included the calculation in GNU Mach. It just doesn't output
anything about the result on the screen. See "linux/dev
> I like the idea of adding a --halt-on-panic option to the configure.
Just make it a kernel command line argument.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:20:32PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:44:05PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
>
> > > > The time it pauses is too short to write down all registers. We should
> > > > consider increasing it.
> > >
> > > The time is a rapid spinning loop, IIRC, and
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:44:05PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> > > The time it pauses is too short to write down all registers. We should
> > > consider increasing it.
> >
> > The time is a rapid spinning loop, IIRC, and has gotten shorter as
> > processors have gotten faster; it should be ti
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:44:05PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 02:54:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The time it pauses is too short to write down all registers. We should
> > > consider increasing it.
>
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 02:54:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The time it pauses is too short to write down all registers. We should
> > consider increasing it.
>
> The time is a rapid spinning loop, IIRC, and has gotten shorter as
>
¿©·¯ºÐ¿¡°Ô °¡Àå ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°í À¯ÀÍÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À»
ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ñ °¡°Ý¿¡ °ø±ÞÇÕ´Ï´Ù
ÃֽŰÔÀÓ. À¯Æ¿°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. MP3. ºñµð¿À½Ãµð µîµî
¸ðµç ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÆǸÅÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 5¿ù ÃֽŸ®½ºÆ®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¹°·Ð ½Å¿ë °ÆÁ¤À» ÀüÇô ½Å°æ¾²Áö ¸¶½Ê½Ã¿ä
¾ÐÃàÈÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ Àüȳª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä
ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½ ¾Æ
