Hi Marcus,
We are hoping to include Phil Charles' hurd iso CD image at hurd.gnu.org .
Could you verify for us whether or not the base14.tgz has any non-free
software included. Verification of this information is necessary in order to
adhere to the gnu.org website guidelines. Please reply via [EMA
> GNU Mach currently only supports speedsup to 38400.
The com driver actually goes to 57600, I think.
But chario.c checks NSPEEDS.
> Will it work to set a divisor of "1" in i386/i386at/com.c and a new symbol
> "B115200 16" in include/device/tty_status.h to implement 115200 speed?
No, but it w
Hi,
GNU Mach currently only supports speedsup to 38400.
Will it work to set a divisor of "1" in i386/i386at/com.c and a new symbol
"B115200 16" in include/device/tty_status.h to implement 115200 speed?
I know zip about modem programming, and it might require some special setup
to get working. I
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:54:22PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> > I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> > in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
>
> When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
> be a good idea to
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 02:22:55PM -0500, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> Hello all. I have been playing with PPP some more, but I am not very successfuly as
> it seems pfinet just does not like me :P. It is basically doing the same thing as
> bafore failing to set the gateway address initially then aft
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> > in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
>
> When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
> be a good idea
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
When pthreads will actually be implemented. Do you think it would
be a good idea to rewrite t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
> in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
Ah, okay. My initial thought had been to simply take MIT pthreads or
something like that, an
I had never anticipated anyone trying to implement pthreads for the Hurd
in any way but by a substantial rewrite of the libc hurd code.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
I've been hacking a bit at the pthreads problem.
If(when) I get this right, should I do anything to be careful of the
interaction between pthreads and cthreads? I notice that most of
glibc is reasonably oblivious to threads, but the hurd directories use
them alot. I'm concerned that the underly
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:18:12AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> I have an idea about using drivers with GNUMach:
> 1. There is a kernel compiled without ../configure options
> 2. There is a multi-boot module linux-drivers that contains all Linux 2.4
>drivers. Option `all' tries all drivers.
11 matches
Mail list logo