Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:17:35PM +1000, Andrew Clausen wrote: > OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: > > Hurd is a part of GNU. So if you just say GNU, it should mean GNU/Hurd > > operating system. (IMO, it would be better to rename device_linux.c to > > device_linux_gnu.c, but this name is too long to type i

[Postmaster+auto@ruhr-uni-bochum.de: Virus-Warnung]

2001-03-29 Thread Matthias Berse
Hi *, I'm getting (or better getting not, cause they are infected) emails, which contain the W32.Hybris.gen-Virus. Since I have no idea, from whom this mail originates, I hope all you guys using windoze for mail biz check their machines... Thanks, Matthias - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PR

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Andrew Clausen
Andrew Clausen wrote: > So, the arch interface is something like: > _arch_device_{new,stat,[refresh]_{open,close},read,write,check,sync} > _arch_probe_all > > the private _ped_device() interface would be: > _ped_device_alloc() > _ped_device_free() > _ped_device_register() > _ped_device_unregister

Enanito si, pero con que pedazo!

2001-03-29 Thread Hahaha
Faltaba apenas un dia para su aniversario de de 18 años. Blanca de Nieve fuera siempre muy bien cuidada por los enanitos. Ellos le prometieron una *grande* sorpresa para su fiesta de compleaños. Al entardecer, llegaron. Tenian un brillo incomun en los ojos... blanca de nieve.scr

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Andrew Clausen
OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: > Hurd is a part of GNU. So if you just say GNU, it should mean GNU/Hurd > operating system. (IMO, it would be better to rename device_linux.c to > device_linux_gnu.c, but this name is too long to type in...) I disagree. It isn't a port to an operating system, it is a port

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Andrew Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port. Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:54:46 +1000 > So, I propose that we have 3 files: device.c, device_linux.c, device_gnu.c > (BTW, why not device_hurd.c?) Hurd is a part of GNU. So if you just say GNU

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Andrew Clausen
Neal H Walfield wrote: > > OK. This in parted 1.5.x or 1.4.x? Anyway, I can't reproduce it. > > 1.5.x. > > I am curious what they plans are for intergrating the code and what, if > any thing, you would like me to do. Sorry, I should have written to you earlier... although I think this stuff i

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Neal H Walfield
> Your name does not appear in > fencepost.gnu.org:/gd/gnuorg/copyright.list > > So, the assignment process hasn't been completed for your Hurd > work? What was the disclaimer you signed? Could you please > send it to me (with what you filled in, etc.) Thanks. I am working on this with Brian.