On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 06:25:56AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > This patch makes Parted much more portable
>
> Can you please resend the patch? I'm having lots of problems
> applying it. I suspect it got mangled on the way... so could
> you send it as a gzipped att
> In future, I think it would be better to let me / the maintainer
> know when you intend to write a non-trivial patch. I would
> have preferred that this be done in lots of small patches, but
> don't worry now...
You are right. However, as I do not have a lot of access to the net
(once a week)
handle-port.c has the following comment:
/* Backwards compatibility. Use trivfs_create_control. */
The ChangeLog has the following comment:
Thu May 9 15:32:38 1996 Michael I. Bushnell, p/BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile (OTHERSRCS): Delete handle-port.c.
* trivfs.h (triv
> Well, you could store an ihash_t in the struct, which is a pointer.
> Why would you want to store the struct and use init/destroy? You need the
> address anyway when invocing the functions operating on it.
>
> Are you taking advantage of this in some code?
No, however, Thomas is. Take a look
