Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Mridul Jain
> > By the way Elliot Lee, the instigator of the ORBit > > project, thinks that he can, without violating the > > CORBA spec, get the cost of a CORBA call darn > close to > > that of a standard library call, where a local > > implementation of the requested service is > > available. > > Do you ha

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Igor Khavkine
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:21:16AM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote: > > We're talking about a microkernel arch, but still I'm > > not sure if turning hurd into gnome is a good idea. > [...] > > Interoperability is a good idea, but if you bloat the > > whole code with interoperability stuff then it blows

Recycler's Exchange - FREE

2001-02-13 Thread 714lkj
The Best Recycling Auction Experience Just Got Even BETTER! Now, every auction at www.RecycleAuction.com, is - FREE - - -FREE - - - FREE EVERY DAY! That’s right! NO fee, We’re FREE! Effective immediately, the Internet’s most popular and powerful recycling site is now making it even easier

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Farid Hajji
> We're talking about a microkernel arch, but still I'm > not sure if turning hurd into gnome is a good idea. [...] > Interoperability is a good idea, but if you bloat the > whole code with interoperability stuff then it blows up. You can add as much interoperability stuff between apps. if you wis

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 03:04:48PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > I think it is single server, not multi server. There are many single server > > systems, and they share the same deficiencies as monolithical kernels. > > The linux kernel is also "modular", the

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Eray Ozkural (exa)
Mridul Jain wrote: > > Anyway, those > > people have been there'n' done that, and AFAIK they > > aren't trying to > > facilitate a multi-language development for their > > modular > > kernels, why not? > > Come on let's not bring in Billy here.Ok you can be > happy coding in VB thro'out. > Bill

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Eray Ozkural (exa)
Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > I think it is single server, not multi server. There are many single server > systems, and they share the same deficiencies as monolithical kernels. > The linux kernel is also "modular", the term is not clear and as thus it is > confusing to use it. Let me just confes

Re: MIG->Corba (performance)

2001-02-13 Thread Eray Ozkural (exa)
Ognyan Kulev wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > > > One beautiful solution will be batching many IPC requests in one context > > > switch, e.g. (open,read,close). > > > > You mean a burst tra

Re: MIG->Corba

2001-02-13 Thread Adam Olsen
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:31:54AM -0800, Mridul Jain wrote: > > hi, > > > I can notice the messages as they are being sent > > on this GNOME > > > desktop. That would not make a good bet for a hurd > > server. > > > > IMHO CORBA can be as fast as Mig, even faster. > > > yes I agree that IPC is