Further life complications

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff Bailey
Sorry about not getting web site work done this weekend. My cat went into emergency care on Sunday morning, and this swallowed up the time I had planned to use to get the L4/Mach stuff posted. I'll catch it as quickly as I can. -- No matter how big the bell, if you only tap it, it can give

Bug#75734: marked as done (hurd: please add build-depends)

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#74794: marked as done (gnumach: please build-depend on sharutils)

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#72319: marked as done (Empty Executable File Forces Hurd Reboot)

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#69281: marked as done (More isofs symlink weirdness (test-case))

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#68626: marked as done (ln 2 pfinet -> operation not supported)

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#68417: marked as done (isofs and symlink brokeness)

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:59:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line eh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Processed: Fixed in NMU hurd 20001126

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 68417 fixed Bug#68417: isofs and symlink brokeness Severity set to `fixed'. > severity 68626 fixed Bug#68626: ln 2 pfinet -> operation not supported Severity set to `fixed'. > severity 69281 fixed Bug#69281: More isofs symlink weirdness (tes

Processed: Fixed in NMU gnumach 1:1.2-8

2000-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 74794 fixed Bug#74794: gnumach: please build-depend on sharutils Severity set to `fixed'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) _