Re: gnumach and oskit headers

2000-10-17 Thread Roland McGrath
> I've looked through gnumach's machine dependent headers trying to see > where they could be replaces by equivalet oskit headers to eliminate > redundancy. So now I've eliminated most of the redundancy and removed the > unneeded headers from my local copy of gnumach (oskit-mach) rather. Please

Re: mig defs mismatch

2000-10-17 Thread Roland McGrath
> The output goes on for sometime, however, as you can see from this > snip-it, the order of parameters are _different_ in each of the versions! > And not only that, they take different parameters. Even stranger is that > > # diff hurd/fsys.defs /include/hurd/fsys.defs > > shows that they two

Re: Server writing: observations and questions

2000-10-17 Thread Roland McGrath
> A client gets a port with a send right to the server using > file_name_lookup, i.e.: > > file_t server; > server = file_name_lookup (argv[1], O_READ, 0666); > > Generally, these above flags/permissions work, however what is the > best combination and what do they mean in this conte

Re: storeio (in)activation (was: Re: CDROM lock

2000-10-17 Thread Roland McGrath
In oskit-mach, device_close is a no-op and releasing the last send right to the port returned by device_open is what closes the device. Then there is nothing extra to worry about, even in case of untimely death of translator. So there. ___ Bug-hurd mai

´ëüÀÇÇÐ Á¤º¸¾È³»

2000-10-17 Thread Lee YoungNam
PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMC8vRU4iPg0KPGh0 bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjx0aXRsZT5idWctaHVyZLTUIL7Is+fHz73KtM+x7j88L3RpdGxlPg0K PG1ldGEgbmFtZT0iZ2VuZXJhdG9yIiBjb250ZW50PSJOYW1vIFdlYkVkaXRvciB2My4wIj4N CjwvaGVhZD4NCg0KPEJPRFkgdGV4dD1ibGFjayB2TGluaz1wdXJwbGUgYUxpbms9cmVkIGxp bms9Ymx