Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
It's the amount that diskfs knows it can use without diskfs_grow.
> Is it okay for np->allocsize to be initially as big as needed to contain the
Answers to this stuff should really come from Thomas. I am just speaking
directly out of my ass here, without even source on hand to read.
> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
I would not put it exactly that way, but yes. all
From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 May 2000 10:03:52 +0300
According to the glibc manual, the result of setjmp must not be
assigned like diskfs_catch_exception does: it must be either
immediately used in a do/while/for/if/switch statement or
ignored. Has G
