Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-03-10 Thread Roland McGrath
> All the calls to mach_task_self() are mapped by the defines to simple > variable __mach_task_self. There is no funtion call to initialise the > variable. I have run nm though the object on both new Hurd and old Hurd, > to show this. The initialization happens in the libc function `__mach_init

Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-03-10 Thread Chris Lingard
I can tell you how to fix this bug; but the attached fragment of code is probably in the wrong place. All the calls to mach_task_self() are mapped by the defines to simple variable __mach_task_self. There is no funtion call to initialise the variable. I have run nm though the object on both ne