Re: xnanosleep range with 64 bit time_t

2007-04-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Dmitry V. Levin on 4/12/2007 6:05 PM: > > modules/nanosleep was updated about 2 months ago, but > modules/gettime still depends on itself. Thanks. I fixed it. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake

Re: xnanosleep range with 64 bit time_t

2007-04-12 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:13:35AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > I have installed the following patch to gnulib [...] > 2006-08-30 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Work around a bug in both the Linux and SunOS 64-bit kernels: > nanosleep mishandles sleeps for longer than 2**31

Re: xnanosleep range with 64 bit time_t

2006-08-31 Thread Paul Eggert
I have installed the following patch to gnulib, which should work around the bugs in SunOS and Linux nanosleep, though it won't work around bugs in some of the changes being proposed for the Linux kernel (changes that I hope are not accepted :-). Obviously the kernel needs to get fixed too, as we