arn...@skeeve.com writes:
>> At this point I wouldn't worry about the older clang and gcc versions
>> that complain about {0} as an initializer. We can either let them die
>> off noisily, or use the appropriate -Wno-whatever option when using them
>> to compile.
>
> I've decided to just not wor
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 5/27/21 1:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > Yet another portable solution is:
> >
> > static mbstate_t s1;
> > mbstate_t s = s1;
> >
> > also with its own form of ugliness.
>
> I did that years ago, but compilers complained about it when I made s1
> 'const', and I vaguely
On 5/27/21 1:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Yet another portable solution is:
static mbstate_t s1;
mbstate_t s = s1;
also with its own form of ugliness.
I did that years ago, but compilers complained about it when I made s1
'const', and I vaguely recall complaints even when it wasn't 'const'
("W
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > > dfa.c:1627:19: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject
> > > [-Wmissing-braces]
> > > mbstate_t s = { 0 };
> > > ^
> > > {}
> > > 1 warning generated.
>
> { 0 } is the
Hi Arnold,
> > OSX 10.11.6
> > Building after using 'touch .developing' for the first time, I get
> >
> > depbase=`echo dfa.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`;\
> > gcc -DGAWK -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I"./.." -I. -I.. -I/opt/local/include
> > -I/opt/local/include -g -O2 -DARRAYDEBUG -DYYDEBUG -DLOCAL
Hi.
I got the below from one of my testers. If y'all feel like updating the
relevant files in GNULIB, that'd be great. If instead you feel like,
well, to heck with that, that's also OK. :-)
Thanks,
Arnold
> From: Pat Rankin
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:13:33 -0700
>
> > https://www.skeeve.com/g
