Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> > - automatic daily backup,
>>
>> Not relevant.
>> With git or hg, anyone who pulls gets the entire repository.
>
> Hmm, but if the central repository got lost, and was restored through - say -
> my copy, everyone would see my temporary branches,
No
> > Do you have a comparison of git with mercurial, monotone, bzr?
Reading the wikipedia articles on each of them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_(software)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercurial_(software)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotone_(software)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Would anyone be averse to switching gnulib development from CVS to git?
>>> I switched coreutils a month ago and am very happy with the result.
>>
>> Do you have a comparison of git with mer
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Would anyone be averse to switching gnulib development from CVS to git?
>> I switched coreutils a month ago and am very happy with the result.
>
> Do you have a comparison of git with mercurial, monotone, bzr?
There are *lots* of git
