Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> > Do we want a tmpfile-gnu module that guarantees that tmpfile() is
>> > not constrained by silly platform limits, and does not put garbage
>> > on stderr on failure to create a temporary file?
>>
>> That sounds worthwhile.
>> No one wants their daemon o
Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Do we want a tmpfile-gnu module that guarantees that tmpfile() is
> > not constrained by silly platform limits, and does not put garbage
> > on stderr on failure to create a temporary file?
>
> That sounds worthwhile.
> No one wants their daemon or library code to spew diag
Eric Blake wrote:
...
> This is a proof-of-concept patch; it solves the problem at hand,
> but has some dependencies on incompatible modules that would
> need to be relaxed to LGPLv2+ before this module could be used
> in libvirt.
>
...
> Do we want a tmpfile-gnu module that guarantees that tmpfile
