Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible writes:
>> Sounds good!
>>
>> /Simon
>
> Thanks for all your voices.
>
> I plan to start implementing this decision this week-end.
Yay! I'll be happy to test it again after then, and report any
remaining problem there may be with running the test suite, so feel free
to
> Sounds good!
>
> /Simon
Thanks for all your voices.
I plan to start implementing this decision this week-end.
Bruno
Bruno Haible writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'. It
>> seems to be finding problems, failing with:
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> [...]
>> GPL?? lib/xstrtoull.c
>>
On Sun, May 23, 2021, 8:05 AM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Does everyone still agree
> - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
> with the module description, and
> - to remove the statement from the documentation
> "The source files always say "GPL", but the real l
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Does everyone still agree
> - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
> with the module description, and
> - to remove the statement from the documentation
> "The source files always say "GPL", but
On 5/23/21 4:19 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Does everyone still agree
- to put into the source files a license header that is consistent
with the module description, and
- to remove the statement from the documentation
"The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
spe
Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'. It
> seems to be finding problems, failing with:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> [...]
> GPL?? lib/xstrtoull.c
> GPL?? l
Hello!
I'm discovering this project and attempted to run 'make check'. It
seems to be finding problems, failing with:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
[...]
GPL?? lib/xstrtoull.c
GPL?? lib/xstrtoumax.c
GPL
