I added this bugfix to the new strstr and strcasestr implementations.
diff -c -3 -r1.1 strcasestr.c
*** strcasestr.c17 Aug 2005 14:09:19 - 1.1
--- strcasestr.c19 Aug 2005 11:00:06 -
***
*** 88,94
{
if (!mbui_av
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 20:37 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> > About the strcasestr module, is there any reason why strcasestr is not
> > redefined to rpl_strcasestr, since you plan that it will be a permanent
> > strcasestr replacement ?
>
&
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> About the strcasestr module, is there any reason why strcasestr is not
> redefined to rpl_strcasestr, since you plan that it will be a permanent
> strcasestr replacement ?
The AC_DEFINE inside m4/strcasestr.m4 is meant to take care of this. Why
doesn'
asestr implementation.
About the strcasestr module, is there any reason why strcasestr is not
redefined to rpl_strcasestr, since you plan that it will be a permanent
strcasestr replacement ?
--
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
bug-gn
With the mbuiter module (unbounded iteration, similar to mbiter), it
was now easy to write strcasestr() in a way that works in multibyte locales.
Bruno
== modules/strcasestr
Description:
strcasestr() function: case-insensitive search for a
