Paul Eggert wrote:
> > enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
> > ...
> > return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
> > + !m + !n + !o);
> >
> > You are expecting that j and l evaluate to true?
>
> No, I'm just making sure that every
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Paul,
>
> This snippet of code in stdbool.m4, added on 2004-06-01, looks fishy to me:
>
> enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
> ...
> return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
> + !m +
Hi Paul,
This snippet of code in stdbool.m4, added on 2004-06-01, looks fishy to me:
enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
...
return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
+ !m + !n + !o);
You are expecting that j and l evaluate to t
