Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> How about diagnosing a missing License: when
>> the module is not a -test one?
>
> Neat idea. This one can be implemented without a heuristic. Done as follows:
Thanks!
>
> 2011-12-03 Bruno Haible
>
> gnulib-tool: Verify that the License field i
Jim Meyering wrote:
> How about diagnosing a missing License: when
> the module is not a -test one?
Neat idea. This one can be implemented without a heuristic. Done as follows:
2011-12-03 Bruno Haible
gnulib-tool: Verify that the License field is present and non-empty.
* gnul
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Bruno, what do you think about making gnulib-tool warn about
>> that syntax error?
>
> You can not anticipate all kinds of typos that can occur. Similar things
> would have happened if someone wrote
>
> Licence:
>
> instead of
>
> License:
>
> IMO warnings th
Hi Jim,
> Bruno, what do you think about making gnulib-tool warn about
> that syntax error?
You can not anticipate all kinds of typos that can occur. Similar things
would have happened if someone wrote
Licence:
instead of
License:
IMO warnings that rely on heuristics belong more into 'syn
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>> You may need to add #include directives for the following .h files.
>> #include
>> ... [SNIP]
>> #include
>> #include
>> /* Include only after all system include files. */
>> GPL
>> License
>> #include "acl.h"
>> #includ
Hi Stefano,
> You may need to add #include directives for the following .h files.
> #include
> ... [SNIP]
> #include
> #include
> /* Include only after all system include files. */
> GPL
> License
> #include "acl.h"
> #include "alignof.h"
> # ... [SNIP
Hello gnulibers.
While boostrapping the latest coreutils from master (v8.14-79-g1a85d4a),
I've noticed some spurious lines in the messages generated (I believe)
from the `bootstrap 'script; here is an excerpt that should highlight
them:
...
Creating ./lib/uniwidth/.gitignore
Creating ./m4/.
