Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The patch is fine
OK. Testing revealed a few tweaks were necessary (attached below).
> There's quite some duplication in the macros
Yes. There's a trade-off between duplication on one side and complexity
(pushdef, popdef) that reduces the ease of understanding of the *.m4
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 01:27:17AM CET:
> Here's a proposed patch, which seeks to fix 1) to 5). Ralf will need to
> re-test on AIX.
No more problems on AIX with this patch. Thanks!
> 2010-01-17 Bruno Haible
>
> New modules acosl, asinl, atanl, cosl, expl
On 01/18/2010 01:27 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
AIX 5.3 needs a number of #undef's in math.in.h, in order to compile,
I don't want to consider Ralf's patch, because the 'mathl' module is broken
in so many respects that first a cleanup is needed.
The patch is fin
Hi Paolo,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> AIX 5.3 needs a number of #undef's in math.in.h, in order to compile,
I don't want to consider Ralf's patch, because the 'mathl' module is broken
in so many respects that first a cleanup is needed. The problems with the
'mathl' module are:
1) It provides func
