Hello Ralf,
> one problem with the script you've posted
> is that it does not carry a copyright statement of any kind, which means
> it wouldn't be possible for somebody else to use
OK, I hereby declare formally: The 'rerun' script that I wrote and posted
in <h
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:42:50PM CEST:
> > Wouldn't build-aux/rerun be a good candidate for a new gnulib module?
>
> No, why would it? Packages don't ship 'rerun'. Only maintainers have it in
> their PATH somewhere.
>
&
Hi Ralf,
> Wouldn't build-aux/rerun be a good candidate for a new gnulib module?
No, why would it? Packages don't ship 'rerun'. Only maintainers have it in
their PATH somewhere.
I haven't initiated moving 'git-merge-changelog' out of gnulib, where it
d
