Paul Eggert wrote:
> if we uniformly substitute __obstack_free for _obstack_free, and omit the
> change's last hunk, then the change should be OK for glibc.
Thanks for the advice. I committed this.
2006-10-23 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I propose this one. Paul, do you think you can push that into glibc?
I think glibc would take that change, yes. I'll put it on my list of
things to do.
> * lib/obstack.h (_obstack_free): New macro. Declare instead of
> obstack_free.
That d
Hi,
To follow the Ralf's advice for gnulib code in shared libraries, one needs
to rename the exported symbols. Among those, one finds 'obstack_free'
from the obstack module. Renaming this one is not easy, because
1. it occurs in obstack.h both as macro and as function name,
2. any patch should
