Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Paul and Jim,
>
> It bothers me that in order to implement a basic functionality like the
> 'closeout' module, you need the __fpending module, which is not based on
> POSIX but rather a case-by-case hack for various platforms.
>
> Here is a proposed pa
Jim Meyering wrote:
> This looks potentially disruptive.
> Have you tested it much?
I've verified (in gettext) that the fwriteerror_no_ebadf function works
as advertised. I haven't tested close-stream and closeout, since I don't
use them directly in my packages. You're always invited to proofread/
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul and Jim,
>
> It bothers me that in order to implement a basic functionality like the
> 'closeout' module, you need the __fpending module, which is not based on
> POSIX but rather a case-by-case hack for various platforms.
>
> Here is a proposed patc
Hi Paul and Jim,
It bothers me that in order to implement a basic functionality like the
'closeout' module, you need the __fpending module, which is not based on
POSIX but rather a case-by-case hack for various platforms.
Here is a proposed patch to lift this dependency. Instead of using
__fpendi
