Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, for the time of migration, we can limit our uses of > AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE to a single function name; see attached patch. Thanks; I installed that. >> gnulib-tool assumes Autoconf 2.57 through 2.59, since it copies >> m4/onceonly_2_57.m4. > > Doe

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jim, * Jim Meyering wrote on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:29:47PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One solution is to forbid _any_ Gnulib (or other non-Autoconf-provided) > > macro to start with `AC_'. I thought this was a convention agreed upon > > long ago (much longer t

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bruno Haible wrote on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:06:29PM CEST: > > Does m4/onceonly_2_57.m4 break with autoconf-2.60? It produces smaller code, > by using some undocumented hooks of autoconf. (I had actually hoped to see > this implementation be moved to autoconf-2.60, rather than the less optimize

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:50:48AM CEST: >> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in >> > + autoconf >= 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is >> > + whitespace.

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:50:48AM CEST: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in > > + autoconf >= 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is > > + whitespace. > > I hadn't noticed this incompatibility. It is

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in > > + autoconf >= 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is > > + whitespace. > > I hadn't noticed this incompatibility. It is a real hassle. The comma separator in autoconf's AC_CHECK_DECLS is a hassle, because i

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also propose a similar comment to extensions.m4, see below. Thanks, I installed that. > + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in > + autoconf >= 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is > + whitespace. I hadn't noticed this incom

prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-19 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, It appears that autoconf-2.60 may be released soon. I added comments to longdouble.m4 and onceonly.m4 relating to the new macros in autoconf-2.59d. I also propose a similar comment to extensions.m4, see below. Bruno diff -c -3 -r1.5 longdouble.m4 *** longdouble.m4 18 Jan 2005 13:07:56