Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-03-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:52:55PM CET: >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > * Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:42:18PM CET: >> >> > >> >> > 2) Similar with getaddrinfo.m4, except there i

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-03-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:52:55PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:42:18PM CET: > >> > > >> > 2) Similar with getaddrinfo.m4, except there is no need to store > >> > additional information here.

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-03-07 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * readline.m4 (gl_FUNC_READLINE): Rewrite the cached part of the > test to be side-effect free by storing the result in the cache > variable gl_cv_lib_readline, and moving the assignment of > LIBREADLINE and LTLIBREADLIN

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-03-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Simon, * Simon Josefsson wrote on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 06:28:35PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Would you install the remaining part of my patch as well, please? > > Have you signed copyright papers for gnulib? I can't find them. This process is not finished yet,

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) readline.m4 gives different results with cached reruns: for example, > on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: > > ./configure -C > -> LIBREADLINE="-lreadline -lncurses" > ./config.status --recheck > -> LIBREADLINE="-lreadline" > > This is becau

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-02-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:42:18PM CET: > > > > 2) Similar with getaddrinfo.m4, except there is no need to store > > additional information here. Beware, the getaddrinfo part of the > > patch is completely untested. > > The following patch to getaddrinfo HAS been tes

Re: play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-02-24 Thread Eric Blake
> > 2) Similar with getaddrinfo.m4, except there is no need to store > additional information here. Beware, the getaddrinfo part of the > patch is completely untested. The following patch to getaddrinfo HAS been tested: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-02/msg00057.html And it

play nice with AC_CACHE_CHECK

2006-02-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
1) readline.m4 gives different results with cached reruns: for example, on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: ./configure -C -> LIBREADLINE="-lreadline -lncurses" ./config.status --recheck -> LIBREADLINE="-lreadline" This is because the commands to set the cache variable `gl_cv_lib_readlin