Re: patch to lib-prefix.m4

2009-07-01 Thread Monty Taylor
Bruno Haible wrote: > Monty Taylor wrote: >>> Specifying -m64 in the CFLAGS is not enough. The autoconf documentation [1] >>> recommends to use either >>> CPPFLAGS=-m64 LDFLAGS=-m64 >>> or >>> CC="gcc -m64". >>> >>> The reason is precisely so that autoconf tests which run the preprocessor >>> w

Re: patch to lib-prefix.m4

2009-06-24 Thread Bruno Haible
Monty Taylor wrote: > > Specifying -m64 in the CFLAGS is not enough. The autoconf documentation [1] > > recommends to use either > > CPPFLAGS=-m64 LDFLAGS=-m64 > > or > > CC="gcc -m64". > > > > The reason is precisely so that autoconf tests which run the preprocessor > > will yield the expected

Re: patch to lib-prefix.m4

2009-06-22 Thread Monty Taylor
Bruno Haible wrote: > [Adding CC to bug-gnulib] > > Hi, > > Monty Taylor wrote: >> I've got a patch for lib-prefix.m4, but I'm not sure if it should go to >> gettext or to gnulib. (Thanks for writing it, btw) >> >> It's related to 64-bit detection on Solaris. (Which makes me want to >> kill some

Re: patch to lib-prefix.m4

2009-06-22 Thread Bruno Haible
[Adding CC to bug-gnulib] Hi, Monty Taylor wrote: > I've got a patch for lib-prefix.m4, but I'm not sure if it should go to > gettext or to gnulib. (Thanks for writing it, btw) > > It's related to 64-bit detection on Solaris. (Which makes me want to > kill someone, btw) Just running the preproc