On 8 February 2013 16:09, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks for the diagnosis. I should have proofread the Jan 31
> openpty patch better. Reuben, if the openpty module is used,
> application code should not inspect HAVE_OPENPTY to decide whether
> to use openpty -- instead, the idea is that applicati
Thanks for the diagnosis. I should have proofread the Jan 31
openpty patch better. Reuben, if the openpty module is used,
application code should not inspect HAVE_OPENPTY to decide whether
to use openpty -- instead, the idea is that application code can
simply invoke openpty as if it were a GNU p
fredag den 8 februari 2013 klockan 10:01 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
> The change introduced in gnulib-9fd is broken
> on OpenSolaris and Solaris 11.
And OpenBSD.
> The reason is that said patch erroneously leads
> to a claim
>
>/* config.h */
># define HAVE_OPENPTY 1
It seems
The change introduced in gnulib-9fd is broken
on OpenSolaris and Solaris 11.
The reason is that said patch erroneously leads
to a claim
/* config.h */
# define HAVE_OPENPTY 1
This leads to an undefined linker reference
in "openpty.o" and thus also in "libgnu.a".
On behalf of GNU Inetu
