Re: dependencies to obsolete modules

2011-03-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > btw, is the strdup dependency from striconveha really needed?) You don't need to bother, because the 'strdup' module is marked "obsolete", and unless you explicitly pass --with-obsolete, you won't get obsolete modules [1]. Bruno [1] h

Re: [PATCH] do not have regex depend on obsolete modules

2009-01-20 Thread Paolo Bonzini
> This is not needed. gnulib-tool by default ignores dependencies to obsolete > modules already. Patch reverted. Paolo

Re: [PATCH] do not have regex depend on obsolete modules

2009-01-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > 2009-01-20 Paolo Bonzini > > regex: do not depend on obsolete modules. > * modules/regex: Remove memcmp and memmove. > > diff --git a/modules/regex b/modules/regex > index c6a1235..86a19fb 100644 > --- a/modules/regex > +++

[PATCH] do not have regex depend on obsolete modules

2009-01-20 Thread Paolo Bonzini
As per the subject. 2009-01-20 Paolo Bonzini regex: do not depend on obsolete modules. * modules/regex: Remove memcmp and memmove. diff --git a/modules/regex b/modules/regex index c6a1235..86a19fb 100644 --- a/modules/regex +++ b/modules/regex @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ extensions

Re: obsolete modules

2008-11-02 Thread Bruno Haible
ory relative to --dir where auxiliary build tools are placed (default \"build-aux\"). --with-tests Include unit tests for the included modules. + --with-obsolete Include obsolete modules when they occ

Re: obsolete modules

2008-11-02 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > Go ahead and declare these modules "obsolescent", but > rather than ripping out all dependencies on them, > add an option to gnulib-tool (say, --ignore-obsolescent) > to tell it to do ignore any dependency on an obsolescent module. Good idea. For this, it's necessary to forma

Re: obsolete modules / obsolete platforms

2008-09-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Why not document "using the strdup module for the sake of replacing > strdup is now obsolete", removing the dependency when POSIX behavior is > not required ok, why not? > and calling strdup-posix just strdup? IMO it does not hurt to keep the module 'strdup' around, for pa