Eric Blake wrote:
> shouldn't all the rpl_*printf variant
> declarations be given a printf attribute when available so that users of
> the *printf-posix modules still get the benefits of gcc format string
> checking?
Good idea. I'm applying this:
2007-03-10 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 3/9/2007 6:20 PM:
> This module adds a POSIX compliant printf() function. This is the last module
> in this series.
>
> Redefining 'printf' is less easy than redefining 'vprintf' etc., because
> gcc allows to use the symbo
This module adds a POSIX compliant printf() function. This is the last module
in this series.
Redefining 'printf' is less easy than redefining 'vprintf' etc., because
gcc allows to use the symbol 'printf' in __attribute__s of function
declarations. Working around this requires some tricks. You can
