Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - You can bury the 'memcmp' module. It's not needed by ANSI C systems,
> and gnulib assumes ANSI C for ca. 2 years already.
I think we're assuming freestanding C89 or better, right?
memcmp is required for hosted C89, but not for freestanding.
It's
Eric Blake wrote:
> (I'm starting to wonder if it is easier to require all test-foo.c programs to
> declare and populate program_name themselves, rather than relying on the
> progname module.)
Oh no. The progname module is there to simplify things for both programs and
test suite.
It would be b
Hi Eric,
> +2007-12-20 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +
> + Work around circular library issue when cross-compiling.
> + * lib/progname.c (set_program_name): Use strncmp, not memcmp, so
> + that progname.o does not need to pull in rpl_memcmp.
I don't like this patch at all.
I ran into this build failure in m4 when cross-compiling to mingw:
gcc -mno-cygwin -std=gnu99 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -o test-avltree_oset.exe
test-avltree_oset.o libtests.a ../lib/libm4.a libtests.a
libtests.a(progname.o): In function `set_program_name':
../../tests/progname.c:44: undefin
