Re: memrchr on cygwin

2007-01-29 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > OK to apply this? > > 2007-01-29 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lib/memrchr.c: Assume unconditionally, to pull in > size_t as needed. Yes, this is OK. Usually when one needs size_t, including is the preferred choice, because it defines a minimum of decla

memrchr on cygwin

2007-01-29 Thread Eric Blake
memrchr.c used size_t without pulling in the right headers: gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -I/usr/local/include -g2 -Wall -Werror -MT memrchr.o - MD -MP -MF .deps/memrchr.Tpo -c -o memrchr.o memrchr.c memrchr.c:45: error: parse error before "size_t" memrchr.c: In function `memrchr': memrchr.c:53: error: