Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>> Coreutils seems like it may be the better project to drive this effort
>> of trying to merge its maint.mk with gnulib, in order to provide a
>> single maint.mk file useful across multiple projects.
>
> Ok. How many are using maint.mk from gnulib? M
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Coreutils seems like it may be the better project to drive this effort
> of trying to merge its maint.mk with gnulib, in order to provide a
> single maint.mk file useful across multiple projects.
Ok. How many are using maint.mk from gnulib? My plan would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 12/11/2008 1:40 AM:
> I think all the rules in m4's
> maint.mk could be moved into cfg.mk, and then m4 could start to use
> gnulib's maintainer-makefile module too. How about this patch against
> m4?
That only covers
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least coreutils, m4, and autoconf use the gnumakefile but not
> maintainer-makefile from gnulib (mainly because there is a lot of
> merging that has to be done to bring the maint.mk back into a common
> state).
It would be nice to merge these eventually
