Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You are right, the presence of $(ARGZ_H) in $(BUILT_SOURCES) makes this > rule unnecessary. (Historically, the rule predates the use of BUILT_SOURCES.) > Thanks for the hint. I propose this patch in gnulib. Thanks; I installed that. At the same time I c

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Bruno> all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) > > Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in > $(BUILT_SOURCES), and "all" depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? You are right, the presence of $(ARGZ_H) in $(BUILT_SOURCES) makes this rule unnecessary. (Histori

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Bruno> all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in $(BUILT_SOURCES), and "all" depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz __

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:23:26PM CEST: > > The modules in gnulib are normally used in a directory that creates a > single library, say libfoo.la, and in this case a line like > > all-local $(lib_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) > > is meant to be changed to > > all-loca

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You > need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check' > without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build > tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in > libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, a

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ this thread starts at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-06/msg00169.html ] Hi Sven, others, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:11:36AM CEST: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:31:48AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > It's this version that fails on solaris. > > >