Re: lib-link.m4: lib64

2005-09-02 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > Btw, can't we make a module for this? readline need the macro, and > was only including m4/lib-link.m4, not lib-prefix.m4, and maintaining > which m4 macros depend on each other manually for every module seems > like work. Better to make a "lib-link" module, and make read

Re: lib-link.m4: lib64

2005-09-02 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Btw, can't we make a module for this? readline need the macro, and >> was only including m4/lib-link.m4, not lib-prefix.m4, and maintaining >> which m4 macros depend on each other manually for every module seems >> like work. B

Re: lib-link.m4: lib64

2005-09-02 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Further, does this macro handle 64-bit libraries in $prefix/lib64? > > I have committed this untested patch. Do you have time to try it on a mixed > 32/64-bit system? I'm installing it in GnuTLS/GSASL and will report if it break

Re: [bug-gnulib] lib-link.m4: lib64

2005-09-02 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > Further, does this macro handle 64-bit libraries in $prefix/lib64? I have committed this untested patch. Do you have time to try it on a mixed 32/64-bit system? Bruno 2005-08-27 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Support for lib vs. lib64 distinction on biarch