Re: lib/c++defs.h

2011-01-28 Thread Paul Eggert
On 01/28/2011 02:24 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Paul's original > idea seems basically sound ... Thanks, but your argument suggests that my original idea was wrong, since it would mean that files like lib/warn-on-use.h would be distributed without copyright notices. If I'm not mistaken, warn-on-use.h

Re: lib/c++defs.h

2011-01-28 Thread Karl Berry
The difference between build-aux/c++defs.h and lib/c++defs.h is that the former contains a copyright notice - because every file we distribute needs to have a copyright notice -, whereas the latter is literally copied into other .h files and therefore does not have a copyright

Re: lib/c++defs.h

2011-01-27 Thread Karl Berry
whereas the latter is literally copied into other .h files and therefore does not have a copyright notice Having a file in a public repo is legally a kind of distribution. (This is why we're able to increment years in copyright notices on Jan 1, for those who like to do so. :) So the file

Re: lib/c++defs.h

2011-01-26 Thread Bruno Haible
[trimming down the CCs, as this is no longer related to emacs] Paul Eggert wrote: > Currently we build > lib/c++defs.h from build-aux/c++defs.h as part of ordinary > 'make'. But lib/c++defs.h is the same on all platforms. > It would save work for ordinary 'make' i