On Saturday, February 19, 2011 14:49:32 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> further, some of the commands used in git-version-gen require write
> >> access to the .git repo (i.e. git update-index --refresh), which our
> >> package management tools flag as a viol
the current git-version-gen script and its usage in packages such as coreutils
is causing me headaches wrt distros. it currently assumes one of two states:
- the current tree is a valid git repo belonging to the related project
- the current tree is not a git repo (all the way bac
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> the current git-version-gen script and its usage in packages such as
>> coreutils
>> is causing me headaches wrt distros. it currently assumes one of two states:
>> - the current tree is a valid git repo belonging to the related project
>>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the current git-version-gen script and its usage in packages such as coreutils
> is causing me headaches wrt distros. it currently assumes one of two states:
> - the current tree is a valid git repo belonging to the related project
> - the current tree is not a
