Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks, looks good to me.
OK, I've pushed it.
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Sorry about that. glibc's default copyright headers refer to the
> library as a whole as being under the LGPL and it didn't occur to me
> to check whether the gnulib policy is different.
Sure, the handling
Sorry about that. glibc's default copyright headers refer to the
library as a whole as being under the LGPL and it didn't occur to me
to check whether the gnulib policy is different.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks, looks good to me.
Thanks, looks good to me.
The copyright headers of getopt*.h make it sound as if all of gnulib
were under LGPLv2+. But much of gnulib is under GPL. Here's a proposed
wording change.
2017-10-06 Bruno Haible
getopt-posix: Clarify copyright header.
* lib/getopt.in.h: Don't state that gnulib is under LGPL.
