Jim, Eric,
> Wouldn't @command be better than @samp?
Yes, sure. You're right. Committed.
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=7bfb1880ea713532edaaed3386bc0a2ba45a28a6
Bruno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 10/3/2007 6:05 AM:
> 2007-10-03 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * doc/relocatable.texi: Use @samp instead of @program.
Wouldn't @command be better than @samp?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> makeinfo of relocatable.texi yields this error:
>
> relocatable.texi:24: Unknown command `program'.
> relocatable.texi:24: Misplaced {.
> relocatable.texi:24: Misplaced }.
>
> @program is not documented in texinfo-4.11.
>
> Fixing it like this:
>
> 2007-10-
makeinfo of relocatable.texi yields this error:
relocatable.texi:24: Unknown command `program'.
relocatable.texi:24: Misplaced {.
relocatable.texi:24: Misplaced }.
relocatable.texi:34: Unknown command `program'.
relocatable.texi:34: Misplaced {.
relocatable.texi:34: Misplaced }.
@program is not d
