Hi, sorry, I would have, but I intentionally didn't because I didn't
know if you'd consider it useful enough. Hence I hoped you'd filter it
out in that case. Oh well. (puts on flame retardant jacket) :-P
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[please keep the conversation on the list, so that others may chime in. I
have not had time to read your message, but am merely getting it into the
open]
According to Rugxulo on 7/24/2009 12:37 AM:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Eric Bla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Rugxulo on 7/21/2009 8:47 PM:
> Hey,
>I'm really not trying to be a pest, honest, but I personally still
> use DJGPP (on Vista, XP, and real DOS [MS- / DR- / Free-], even).
The best way to not come across as a pest is to post patches
Hey,
I'm really not trying to be a pest, honest, but I personally still
use DJGPP (on Vista, XP, and real DOS [MS- / DR- / Free-], even).
DJGPP still hasn't ever finished the final 2.04, so it's stuck at
beta. Hence the DJGPP guys still port stuff to both 2.03p2 and 2.04.
DJGPP 2.04 beta does ha
