Hi Simon,
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:53:14AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:24:04PM CEST:
> >> --- a/m4/ld-version-script.m4
> >> +++ b/m4/ld-version-script.m4
> >> +# FIXME: The test below returns a false positive f
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:24:04PM CEST:
>> --- a/m4/ld-version-script.m4
>> +++ b/m4/ld-version-script.m4
>> @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice
>> is preserved.
>>
>> dnl From Simon Josefs
Hi Simon,
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:24:04PM CEST:
> --- a/m4/ld-version-script.m4
> +++ b/m4/ld-version-script.m4
> @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is
> preserved.
>
> dnl From Simon Josefsson
>
> +# FIXME: The test below re
It seems mingw accepts the -Wl,--version-script parameters, but it does
not seem to do anything. In particular, a 'local: *;' statement does
not remove internal symbols from the resulting DLL. The m4 test could
be improved to detect this problem, by building a DLL and then building
a program that
