Re: doc: Document the stack-trace and abort-debug modules

2024-07-19 Thread Bruno Haible
> > > The stack-trace and abort-debug modules are now in a state where they > > > can be documented. Done as follows: > > > > Thanks. Are these modules safe to use in signal handlers? > > No, they aren't. They aren't. But you can still get a stack traces, even from signal handlers, with some add

Re: doc: Document the stack-trace and abort-debug modules

2024-07-18 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > The stack-trace and abort-debug modules are now in a state where they > > can be documented. Done as follows: > > Thanks. Are these modules safe to use in signal handlers? No, they aren't. Find attached the log of 'ltrace gltestst/test-stack-trace'. While libbacktrace care

Re: doc: Document the stack-trace and abort-debug modules

2024-07-18 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2024-07-18 05:25, Bruno Haible wrote: The stack-trace and abort-debug modules are now in a state where they can be documented. Done as follows: Thanks. Are these modules safe to use in signal handlers? I suspect that Emacs would need that, in order to use them. Either way, it should be doc

doc: Document the stack-trace and abort-debug modules

2024-07-18 Thread Bruno Haible
The stack-trace and abort-debug modules are now in a state where they can be documented. Done as follows: 2024-07-18 Bruno Haible doc: Document the stack-trace and abort-debug modules. * doc/stack-trace.texi: New file. * doc/gnulib.texi (Particular Modules): Include