[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> The text which rms specified for such things (ensconced in
> maintain.texi) is:
>
> Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
> are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
> notice and this notice are pre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> +This file is free documentation; the Free Software Foundation
> +gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
> +with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
>
> The text which rms specified for such things (e
+This file is free documentation; the Free Software Foundation
+gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
The text which rms specified for such things (ensconced in
maintain.texi) is:
Copying and dist
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The file is only about a page, and forcing everyone to distribute a
> copy of the GFDL with this file seems excessive. How about the
> following license instead, which you used in some other files?
Sure, that's fine; I installed that.
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed this. The only part that might be iffy is the copyright
> notice, but we have to have _some_ copyright notice or otherwise the
> file isn't free, and the GFDL without any required texts seems most
> appropriate.
The file is only about a page,
I installed this. The only part that might be iffy is the copyright
notice, but we have to have _some_ copyright notice or otherwise the
file isn't free, and the GFDL without any required texts seems most
appropriate.
Come to think of it, there are several other gnulib files where the
copyright n
