On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:52 , ext Bruno Haible wrote:
> Rainer Tammer wrote:
>> maybe this is only a glich in the AIX7BETA ?
>
> Maybe. But the commit that I did does not harm; it increases gnulib's
> robustness also for other platforms.
>
> Bruno
>
Bruno,
Apparently this was not the case on O
Hello Bruno,
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Rainer Tammer wrote:
>
>> maybe this is only a glich in the AIX7BETA ?
>>
> Maybe. But the commit that I did does not harm; it increases gnulib's
> robustness also for other platforms.
>
>
Yes,
that's true.
I already reported this to the AIX 7BETA suppo
Rainer Tammer wrote:
> maybe this is only a glich in the AIX7BETA ?
Maybe. But the commit that I did does not harm; it increases gnulib's
robustness also for other platforms.
Bruno
Hello,
Bruno Haible wrote:
>> 2. dirfd
>>
>> xlc -g -o test-canonicalize-lgpl test-canonicalize-lgpl.o
>> ../gllib/libgnu.a
>> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .dirfd
>>
> The logs say:
>
> checking for dirfd... no
> checking whether dirfd is declared... (cached) yes
> c
> 2. dirfd
>
> xlc -g -o test-canonicalize-lgpl test-canonicalize-lgpl.o
> ../gllib/libgnu.a
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .dirfd
The logs say:
checking for dirfd... no
checking whether dirfd is declared... (cached) yes
checking whether dirfd is a macro... no
The m4/d
